Master Cylinders -- A Comparison of Appropriate Application

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
I did a little write up of Master Cylinders for the Aprilia Forum. Since the front brakes on these bikes are very similar this information could be useful for some folks over here too. If you feel compelled to tell me that your stock brakes are just fine please refrain. I don't need to hear how wonderful your experience is with the stock brakes. Some folks want something better than stock, and that's why I've bothered to share this information.

horizontal_rule.jpg

Most folks only think about what new top end to install on their bike, however there are other areas on the bike where riders should consider the big investment. One important area is brakes. On motorcycles the front brake is by far the most important. Some racers even claim that the never use the rear brake. Thus for these purposes I'm only going to speak of front systems. The main upgradable components in a brake system are the Master Cylinder, the line, the Caliper, the disc, and the pads. Some might include fluid, but if you get decent fluid you will probably be okay.

Most of these little bikes come with a two piston caliper. Some of the newer machines come with a four piston caliper, and the bikes with radial two pistons can easily be upgraded to four piston calipers. Master cylinders come in different sizes. The general thought is that a 13mm for two piston, 15/16 mm for four piston, and 19/20mm for 6+pistons.

The Derbi, and Derbi versions of these bikes come with braided lines. If you have an older RS you should upgrade your lines. As for pads there are lots of choices for upgrades. I have had very good experience with the Ferodo pads, but that would be content for another thread. Calipers can be upgraded too. For machines with the axial two piston calipers I don't have any good caliper upgrade suggestions--although I may research this is the future. For the newer Fifties with the radial two piston calipers I suggest getting the four piston caliper AJP that came stock on the Derbi 2T 125--it's probably one of the best upgrades you can make on the bike, as long as you get a decent master with which to accompany. For discs the only upgrade I've ever seen for the Derbi bikes is the Metrakit discs. Okay so lets get to the masters. :p

The AJP four piston caliper found on the Derbi 2T 125
file-7.jpg

The Derbis either came with an AJP axial, or on the newer ones an AJP radial. It's not a bad master, but it is an upgradable component that will yield a huge performance increase. I tried a lot of different masters with the two piston radial caliper. These include the stock, an axial Master from an Aprilia RS125, a radial from an R6, and others. On the stock radial two piston caliper the Aprilia axial master showed an improvement. The R6 was too much master--turned it into a light switch. I really couldn't recommend any of these solutions.

The Yamaha R6 radial master
file-9.jpg

I then upgraded the caliper to a 4 piston AJP. At the time I did this I had the R6 master installed. This combination was the best I had to that point, but once I installed the Brembo 16x18 radial master I found out what a nice setup these bikes could enjoy.

The Brembo 16x18 radial master
file-73.jpg

Recently I've employed the Brembo 16x18 on an older Derbi with the AJP 2 piston axial caliper. It's better than stock, but the modulation isn't nearly as nice as with the AJP four piston axial caliper. I also have an RCS15 on the way to test out with the AJP 4 piston caliper. Below I've listed some other options. Gianluca recently picked up the SXV master, and is running it on his early model RS50 with a stock caliper with good results. He states it is much improved over stock. I think he did try an R6 master, found it to be lacking in modulation.

This is far from an exhaustive list, but it should be enough to help you figure out a direction for your bike. ;)

Alright lets get to some of the options available.

Brembo RCS15 Radial Master
Brembo makes another master called the RCS15 (they also make a 19). This is for us mortals the gold standard. Being a 15mm master is is best suited to the four piston calipers. But because it is adjustable in its cylinder displacement it could be employed on a 2 piston caliper. But for best results it should probably be employed with a 4 piston caliper. One nice feature about the RCS is that it comes with a brake light switch. You do need a special banjo bolt for it which is not included with the master. The thread pitch is 1.0mm, where most banjos on Japanese bikes are 1.25mm. Two different levers are available. Short foldable, long foldable. For these bikes get the short lever. As of this writing the best price I've seen on these is at the Power Barn $335, plus shipping.
brake_master_cylinder_brembo_rcs_15_2.jpg

Brembo 16x18 Radial Master
The 16x18 is quite similar in performance to the RCS15, although you cannot adjust the ratio. Therefore it must be properly matched up with the caliper. Four different levers are available. Short foldable, long foldable, short non-foldable, and long non-foldable. The 16x18 doesn't come with a brake switch, and must employ a pressure switch banjo bolt. Like the RCS the 16x18 employs the 1.0mm banjo bolt threading. The main reason to go with the 16x18 over the RCS15 in our case is pricing, but when you add the pressure switch there's really not much difference. As of this writing the best price I've seen on these is at the Power Barn $270, plus shipping. But when you consider that the RCS comes with the foldable lever the price differential drops significantly. As it jumps to $325 with the foldable lever. So for $10 more you'd be able to get the RCS.
Brembo_16x18_Master_Cylinder_10476080_Pompa_Freno_Radiale.jpg

Aprilia SXV Radial Master
This is the master cylinder that the folks at AF-1 prefer for their single caliper bikes. Banzai also likes this, and has employed it on his Derbi GPR 2T 125. It does come with a brake switch, and reservoir. AF-1 currently has these at $270. But I've seen them list this part at around $200, which it then becomes very attractive. I don't know what the specs are on it because they aren't published, but it is intended for a single caliper, so it is probably a 15/16ish piston. It does come with two clamps, one with a mirror mount, and one without.

851348.jpg

Magura 195 Radial Master Cylinder
Magura makes a lot of cool brakes for different applications. For us the model of interest is the 195. It is available in 13mm, 16mm, and 20mm. Thus being available in a 13mm might be one of the best choices for a stock caliper on our bikes. These go for around $280. They look to be totally rebuildable with parts available. That's a big deal! The 195 comes with a brake switch, and the res is extra. The cylinder is made from forged aluminum. Speedy is running one of these on his RSKX100 with a four piston caliper with good success.


Magura-MasterCylinder-195radial.jpg
 

JainAshish46

New Member
I'm thinking of getting a Brembo. Which one should I go for? Rcs Radial 16, 17 or 19? Heard brembo stopped making 17 now.

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
 

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
It's a preference, but I really like the Brembos

Yeah of the masters I've employed the Brembos are superior. The R6 master world work on the 390 since it has a 4 piston caliper. I call the R6 the universal donor bike because the squids buy these, wreck them, and the parts become available. If you could fine one for under $100 it would be a nice upgrade. The 16x18 radial Brembo would probably be the best choice for the track because you don't need a light switch, and you don't need the piston adjustability, nor do you need the folding lever (although you could get it). For the street if you have the cash the RCS15 is a fantastic master. You'd have to spend a lot more, and I mean a lot, to get something that performed noticeably better with the 390.

I've hunted around for alternative calipers for the 390. The four piston AJP might be a little bit better, and it might not. If KTM would have spaced the mount at 100mm then there would be a fantastic amount of options. But at 80 (I think that's the spacing, could be 85) there just isn't a whole lot. I have seen some Chinese brands on Alibaba, but I am very suspect of anything that goes into the brakes. Really more than anything on a bike your life depends on the ability to stop.

Oh I missed part of your question--the 15 is the one you want if you go for an RCS. :)
 

JainAshish46

New Member
What about RCS16? Getting a pretty good deal on it since it is lying as an extra with a friend of mine. Hahaha....

Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
 

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
J, as far as I'm aware that's a clutch lever, but I could be mistaken. The RCS15 can be a 16 by adjusting it.

P, I'm not familiar with that one. If you are thinking to put it on some vintage machine it would probably do nicely. If you are considering it for the 390 I wouldn't bother--you probably wouldn't find it to be an improvement over stock. Radial levers are much better than axial levers. If you are on a tight budget the R6 master can be picked up used from a donor cycle, and I'm pretty sure it would be a nice upgrade.
 

psych0hans

Member
Country flag
J, as far as I'm aware that's a clutch lever, but I could be mistaken. The RCS15 can be a 16 by adjusting it.

P, I'm not familiar with that one. If you are thinking to put it on some vintage machine it would probably do nicely. If you are considering it for the 390 I wouldn't bother--you probably wouldn't find it to be an improvement over stock. Radial levers are much better than axial levers. If you are on a tight budget the R6 master can be picked up used from a donor cycle, and I'm pretty sure it would be a nice upgrade.

Thanks for the reply, I actually have an R6 master on my Ninja 250r, which refuses to be bled... lol I have a rebuild kit on the way, so will only know once that arrives. That's also why I'm not too keen on buying used. I'll just hold out for an RCS17 then.
 

Tito_gsx

New Member
I'm running accossato master cylinder 16x16. The sales rep recommended 16x16 instead of 16x18 because our bikes are 2 piston. Brake lever felt too mushy so I removed ABS, added stainless lines and changed to vesrah sintered pads and now brakes are amazing! One finger braking but I still get little bit of fade after long sessions. I strongly recommend to remove ABS if you are serious about upgrading brakes, the extra lines loses any hydraulic advantage that you may gain from master cyl
 

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
Four into One

Hi Tito,

Those are all the things you would want to do to upgrade the brakes. Braided lines, good pads, and a better Master.

Here are some photos of the ByBri caliper on the 390. It's clear to see this is a four piston caliper. You might want to ask your sales rep why he thinks it's a two piston caliper.

Thanks for the post!

KTM 390 bybre-1.JPGKTM 390 bybre-2.JPGKTM 390 bybre-3.JPGKTM 390 bybre-4.JPG
 

DCMoney

Member
Country flag
Also 16x16 and 16x18, the first number usually represents the piston size, while the second number is the distance between the lever's pivot point and the plunger that pushes into the cylinder. 16x16, 16x18, 16x20, with a 16x20 you have more mechanical leverage vs a 16x16, but typically less feel.

Good article explaining master cylinders.

pr3747_1.jpg


Overview of a Brembo Master Cylinders
 

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
Other Masters

This is the stock axial master from a 2009 Aprilia RS125. Interestingly it is listed as a 12.7mm bore.
IMG_2114_zpsp3lznwwu.jpg

Stock Brembo axial master from a 95 Cagiva Mito 125, 13mm bore.
IMG_2115_zpspjevfj6o.jpg

Stock Brembro radial master from an R6 Yamaha, 16mm bore.
IMG_2116_zps18y8ruva.jpg

Stock AJP radial master from a 2005 Derbi GPR, 11mm bore.
derbi%20ajp%20master_zpsih30uaw5.jpg
 

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
Nick's No No

Hi DC,

Thanks for the link to Nick's post. Some of what he says is reasonable info. I however disagree with his statement that a cable clutch is better. Certainly there can be a hydraulic system that isn't any good for which a cable would be better, but in general if a cable was better then we wouldn't be using it for the clutches in our cars, or for our brakes. Now a cable system is much less expensive to build, and that's why you generally see a cable system on a bike. Not for performance, but as a means to meet a cost window. A classic example of this would be Aprilia's move from a hydraulic system on the RSV, to a cable on the RSV4 after Piagio took over the company, and started implementing round the board cost cutting.

It's a bit difficult to see but check out Rossi's M1. What system is this bike employing? That's right hydraulic. Sure the Aprilia 2015 is using a cable, but do you know why? Because they are using the cases from the RSV4 engine. When they start building their real prototype bike I would be greatly surprised to find it using a cable system.

Additionally Nick states that Brembo doesn't make axial masters. What? What planet does Nick live on? From Brembo's own website:
Brembo said:
Brembo's range of products includes radial or axial front master brake cylinders, clutch pumps and rear master brake cylinders.

I suppose I could continue, but I'm not so sure I'd call that page good after seeing these sorts of issues with his text. Caveat Emptor, eh?
2015%2BYamaha%2BMotoGP%2BBike%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2BImage%2B01.png

Oh it's such a pretty bike. :D
 

KTMGene390

New Member
Hi DC,

Thanks for the link to Nick's post. Some of what he says is reasonable info. I however disagree with his statement that a cable clutch is better. Certainly there can be a hydraulic system that isn't any good for which a cable would be better, but in general if a cable was better then we wouldn't be using it for the clutches in our cars, or for our brakes. Now a cable system is much less expensive to build, and that's why you generally see a cable system on a bike. Not for performance, but as a means to meet a cost window. A classic example of this would be Aprilia's move from a hydraulic system on the RSV, to a cable on the RSV4 after Piagio took over the company, and started implementing round the board cost cutting.

What makes a cable system better is the human equation. Cable operated clutch systems offer better feedback as to what is happening at the rear wheel. This is especially noticeable when down shifting multiple gears and feathering the clutch with or without a slipper clutch. Simply put you can feel the clutch engagement better with a cable vs hydraulic setup which dampens the vibrations you feel with a cable.
 

DCMoney

Member
Country flag
Hi DC,

Thanks for the link to Nick's post. Some of what he says is reasonable info. I however disagree with his statement that a cable clutch is better. Certainly there can be a hydraulic system that isn't any good for which a cable would be better, but in general if a cable was better then we wouldn't be using it for the clutches in our cars, or for our brakes. Now a cable system is much less expensive to build, and that's why you generally see a cable system on a bike. Not for performance, but as a means to meet a cost window. A classic example of this would be Aprilia's move from a hydraulic system on the RSV, to a cable on the RSV4 after Piagio took over the company, and started implementing round the board cost cutting.

It's a bit difficult to see but check out Rossi's M1. What system is this bike employing? That's right hydraulic. Sure the Aprilia 2015 is using a cable, but do you know why? Because they are using the cases from the RSV4 engine. When they start building their real prototype bike I would be greatly surprised to find it using a cable system.

Additionally Nick states that Brembo doesn't make axial masters. What? What planet does Nick live on? From Brembo's own website:


I suppose I could continue, but I'm not so sure I'd call that page good after seeing these sorts of issues with his text. Caveat Emptor, eh?
2015%2BYamaha%2BMotoGP%2BBike%2B%2B%2B%2B%2B%2BImage%2B01.png

Oh it's such a pretty bike. :D

The point to the link was to explain the what the numbers mean on the master cylinder, not to break it down for a Phd thesis paper.

He has an opinion on clutch cables vs hydraulic, and so do you. His post from 2008 is wrong about what kind of MC's brembo produces so? I'm human, i'm sure Nick is human and I know I make mistakes. Live and let live, eh?
 

ToraTora

Member
Country flag
Data is Data, Cats

Well that's just it isn't it DC? He's had plenty of time for someone to point it out and fix it. Pointing these things out when sending someone somewhere for valid information seems only decent to me. You suggested a link. I went to it and actually read the information. Even thanked you for posting the link. It's not a thesis to say that it's not entirely valid information. And just so you know, I make mistakes too. When I first wrote up this post for the other forum a friend pointed out an error. I thanked him, and quickly addressed it. Again, the proper thing to do. :cool:

Gene, I'm sure that some cable systems have more feel than some hydraulic systems, but if it were universally true that all cable systems were better than all hydraulic, then you wouldn't have a hydraulic system on the M1. On the bikes I've had with hydraulic clutches there's been plenty of feel. And if we are to think about it with the front brake to me it requires more feel than the clutch, and clearly lots of folks find hydraulics to be a fine mechanism there, correct? Clearly both systems are viable, and in some cases it would appear that hydraulics are preferred. And DC, that's not an opinion, that's a description of the data that's currently available. ;)

Another example of a bike with a hydraulic clutch. They could have put whatever they wanted on this bike, and they did.
marc-marquez-93-dani-pedrosa-26-repsol-honda-motogp-2015-18.jpg


And just so you cats don't say "well yeah sure for MotoGP..." Here's a very competitive 65cc racer (built in America of all places) that features a hydraulic clutch as well. It would appear that where people are given the choice without budget getting in the way they tend to lean towards the hydraulic systems. This being apparent illustrates that the cable isn't always the better mouse trap. None of these three bikes are running hydraulics as a fashion item. These bikes were built to win races. If they didn't feel that hydraulics weren't providing the proper feedback they wouldn't employ them. It is that simple. :cool:
2016-Cobra-CX65.jpg
 

psych0hans

Member
Country flag
I rode a ZX14R yesterday, with a hydraulic clutch. For all practical purposes, I couldn't really feel TOO much of a difference from a cable clutch. Maybe that, or I'm just not observant at all... lol
 

KTMGene390

New Member
Well that's just it isn't it DC? He's had plenty of time for someone to point it out and fix it. Pointing these things out when sending someone somewhere for valid information seems only decent to me. You suggested a link. I went to it and actually read the information. Even thanked you for posting the link. It's not a thesis to say that it's not entirely valid information. And just so you know, I make mistakes too. When I first wrote up this post for the other forum a friend pointed out an error. I thanked him, and quickly addressed it. Again, the proper thing to do. :cool:

Gene, I'm sure that some cable systems have more feel than some hydraulic systems, but if it were universally true that all cable systems were better than all hydraulic, then you wouldn't have a hydraulic system on the M1. On the bikes I've had with hydraulic clutches there's been plenty of feel. And if we are to think about it with the front brake to me it requires more feel than the clutch, and clearly lots of folks find hydraulics to be a fine mechanism there, correct? Clearly both systems are viable, and in some cases it would appear that hydraulics are preferred. And DC, that's not an opinion, that's a description of the data that's currently available. ;)

Another example of a bike with a hydraulic clutch. They could have put whatever they wanted on this bike, and they did.
marc-marquez-93-dani-pedrosa-26-repsol-honda-motogp-2015-18.jpg


And just so you cats don't say "well yeah sure for MotoGP..." Here's a very competitive 65cc racer (built in America of all places) that features a hydraulic clutch as well. It would appear that where people are given the choice without budget getting in the way they tend to lean towards the hydraulic systems. This being apparent illustrates that the cable isn't always the better mouse trap. None of these three bikes are running hydraulics as a fashion item. These bikes were built to win races. If they didn't feel that hydraulics weren't providing the proper feedback they wouldn't employ them. It is that simple. :cool:
2016-Cobra-CX65.jpg

There is nothing wrong with hydraulic clutch systems, they are certainly a viable option. I posted from personal experience and I'm certainly open to new possibilities if I get to test a better hydraulic setup.
 
Top